See for the problem here: Click here
Correct Answer:
(1) The following are the only numbers: 19, 29, 39, 49, 59, 69, 79, 89, 99.
(2) There exists no such three digit number \(abc\) satisfying
Correct answers for (1) were given by Manjunatha M R., Abhishek M. N. and Darshan A. Correct answer to (2) was given only by Manjunatha M. R. We present below the common solution to (1) and two solutions to (2), one by Manjunatha M. R. and the other solution by the poser.
Note. If you find any mistake, please write to us at dep.math.svc@gmail.com
Solution to (1): We have the following condition as has been mentioned in the comment section of the problem by Darshan
This immediatley implies
As \(a\neq 0\), we must have
irresepctive of whatever \(a\) may be. Thus, with \(b=9\), we have the following numbers, for which, one can easily verify that the given conditions are satisfied
Solution to 2: Solution by Manjunatha M. R.
If \(xyz\) is athree digit number, then \(xyz = 100x+10y+z\), where \(x\in (0,9]\) and \(y, z\in [0,9]\).
Let \(x \in (0,9]\), \(y\in(0,9]\) and \(z\in \mathbb{R}\). Consider
The above implies
Or, equivalently
Now, \(x\leq 9\) and \(y \leq 9\). This implies
This implies,
Therfore, we must have that
which cannot happen as \(z\) belongs to \([0,9]\).
Now, the only left out case is \(y=0\). In such a case, we must have that \(99x + 9y = 0\), which simply cannot happen unless \(x=0\). But we must want \(x\neq 0\). Thus the proof that no such number exists.
Original solution:
If \(abc\) is a three digit number sastifying
Notice that for any two numbers \(b, c \in [0, 9]\), the maximum value of \(b\times c) = 81\). Thus \(b\times c -99\) must be a negative number in the above equation. While, \(9b\) is non negative. LHS is always negative (it cannot even be zero) and RHS is non negative. This contradiction leads us to the conclusion that no such three digit number exists.
No comments:
Post a Comment